For many years local residents have complained about cars, taxis, vans and lorries driving onto Mill Road’s pavements, creating a hazard for all pedestrians, but especially for wheelchair-users, people with vision disabilities and for parents with young children. Even when no vehicle is on the the pavement, paving-slabs had been compressed and cracked by irresponsible drivers, crating trip hazards.
Cambridgeshire County Council could deal with the problem, but have done nothing.
Cambridgeshire County Council – as highway authority – has powers to issue a traffic regulation order (TRO) to prohibit parking on Mill Road’s pavements, enforced by their civil parking enforcement officers (CEOs, aka ‘Traffic Wardens’) who could issue an immediate Penalty Charge Notice (PCN, ‘Parking Ticket’). The revenue from PCNs would pay for the cost of enforcement, so no increase in council tax would be needed.
Cambridgeshire County Council, along with all English Traffic Authorities with ‘civil parking enforcement powers’ were granted powers in February 2011 to prohibit, by means of a TRO, parking on footways and verges, wherever they consider it necessary.
Sadly, we have seen no action by Cambridgeshire County Council to tackle this menace.
To view the original letter from the then Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Norman Baker, click the links below:
Today, the Transport Committee launches an inquiry to explore the problems of pavement parking in England and consider possible solutions. As pavement parking is devolved, the focus is on England only.
Parking on pavements creates real problems. For those with visual difficulties, who use mobility aids, or need to navigate footpaths with children, unpredictable hazards such as cars represent a potential danger.
‘Pavement parking’ is when one or more wheels of a vehicle are on the footpath. As well as creating obstacles for people wanting to use footpaths, Councils face additional costs to repair damage to surfaces which are not designed to take the weight of motor vehicles.
A mix of criminal and civil sanctions are available to police and local councils to enforce restrictions on pavement parking on private or commercial drivers. Parking on footways or pavements was banned in London in 1974*, and it’s prohibited for large goods vehicles across England. [ibid]
* The ban applies to all footways and verges, except where there are permitted parking bays laid out (as in some Romsey side-streets). [Our note]
Lack of progress in tackling pavement parking has led many groups to campaign on the issue and although it is regularly raised with MPs by their constituents, the Government has not taken any action on this issue in recent years. [ibid]
This is an area where some people’s actions cause real difficulties for others. Parking on pavements risks the safety of all groups of people from the littlest to the oldest, with differing needs. While we’re also inquiring into Active Travel – how we get more people to get into walking and cycling – we need to make sure it’s safe to take to the streets. We want to hear from the public about the difficulties this presents and the solutions on offer.
Serviced apartment (sui generis use class) scheme containing 39no self-contained 1xbed room units along with Cafe, gym and community space at ground floor with a vehicle drop-off zone, disabled car parking space, cycle parking and associated landscaping and retention of existing BLI frontage.
This proposal comes shortly after a very similar proposal for student apartments was refused planning consent…
So, the plans to turn Romsey labour club into student accommodation have been refused having been called back to the ctte. Romsey cllr @dave4labour tells me there is a "certain irony" that a speculative application like this has been refused & locals did not want student flats
Take a look through some of the drawings from the Cambridge City Council’s planning portal. You can view or download copies of these drawings – and all other documents in connection with this proposal by clicking on this planning reference link: 19/0004/FUL.
Application Validated Date
Thu 03 Jan 2019
Actual Committee Date
Neighbour Consultation Expiry
Fri 08 Feb 2019
Mon 07 Jan 2019
Standard Consultation Expiry
Mon 04 Feb 2019
Last Advertised In Press
Fri 18 Jan 2019
Latest Advertisement Expiry
Fri 08 Feb 2019
Last Site Notice Posted
Fri 25 Jan 2019
Latest Site Notice Expiry
Fri 15 Feb 2019
Agreed Expiry Date
Decision Made Date
Permission Expiry Date
Thu 04 Apr 2019
Temporary Permission Expiry Date
If you have a view on this application, click through on this link 19/0004/FUL, look at the details, register if need be, and submit your comments.
Other trees in Hooper Street have already been lost; each of the remaining trees are therefore more precious, in an otherwise heavily built up area of the city. They are an essential green ‘lung’ for the area, in countering air pollution.
Result for a community that stands together…
Date: 8 January 2019
Application: T 1 & T2: Chestnut – Reduce height by 4/5m and shorten lateral branches by 2/3m to rebalance crowns. T3: Chestnut – Fell. Jubilee House 3 Hooper Street Cambridge CB1 2NZ
Decision on Tree Works Application
Thank you for your letter about the above application. Your views were taken into account in coming to a decision. The application was Tree Refused Permission by senior officers, under delegated powers.
Valid applications including plans, supporting documents, consultation comments and the decision notice are available to view online. Please go to www.cambridge.gov.uk/planningpublicaccess to open the online planning register and enter 18/584/TTPO in the search field.
At the Mill Road Depot consultation in December 2018, PACT learnt that their design requests for the Gatehouse Community Centre on the depot site had been heard, and we feel the design now being submitted for planning approval is excellent and will serve the community well now, and into the future.
PACT would now like to invite you to a meeting to bring you up to date and discuss any ideas you might have, as the location of the community centre will not only benefit the whole of Petersfield, but also the wider community.
To this end, there will be a meeting at The Salvation Army Community Centre, 104 Mill Road CB1 2BD (next to St Barnabas Church) on Tuesday 26th March at 7.30pm.
Fund your community project with an Area Committee grant
Are you involved with planning a neighbourhood activity taking place between April 2019 and March 2020 which will benefit people who are disadvantaged through social or economic exclusion?
This activity may be eligible for one of our Area Committee grants, covering North, South, East or West Central areas of the city.
Grants can be awarded to non-profit, voluntary and community organisations or groups of local residents.They can be for items which enable an activity to happen e.g. venue hire for local community, arts or sports activities, transport for trips for younger/older residents, materials for art projects, equipment for local sports sessions and much more.
We want these grants to make a difference to the lives of City residents with the highest needs.
At the most easterly end of Mill Road, through Brookfields, across Perne Road are three large lakes. They are not currently open to the general public.
That may change before too long.
The Land South of Coldhams Lane, including the lakes south of the railway and land parcels to the north of the railway, is identified as an “Area of Major Change” in the new Local Plan. As well as built development, ideas include the ecological enhancement of the area, outdoor recreational uses and a new urban country park.
Anderson Group, who own part of the site, is holding a community planning process through the Autumn and has appointed architects and master planners JTP, and other consultants, to work with the local community to create a new Vision for the “Area” including an illustrative masterplan and other matters required by Local Plan Policy 16.
We have received the following communication from Shapour Meftah, Chair, Mill Road Traders’ Association. It is the view of Shapour, but not necessarily of Mill Road Bridges. We are approaching all of the city and county councillors on both sides of the bridge and invite their comments.
Following our recent survey which we managed to reach up to 90% of the traders with shops on the Romsey side. We found that the impact from the Mill Road bridge closure to the traffic has caused a significant loss in takings from 25% up to 60%.
Some Traders are thinking of ceasing trade as their takings have reached well below the threshold to survive. All traders are asking for some sort of compensation and I strongly believe it is their right to do so.
As the Chair of the Mill Road Traders I will use all available resources to help them with their request. The other important information that arose from our survey was about the so-called idea of parklet, which is supposed to be a well consulted plan with Romsey Traders. From the survey we carried out, we found the following:
90% of traders are against
4% in favour
4% Not sure
2% not spoken to (shops closed or shop owner was not available).
The above statistics show that this project was not consulted in detail with the Romsey traders and was rushed through by the Romsey ward team. My understanding, from the meetings we had with the authorities, that Govia has allocated a sum of money for both sides of Mill Road in respect of trying to help the traders and Mill Road communities to overcome and survive the Mill Road bridge closure time. I am very grateful that on the Petersfield side of Mill Road, we had lots of positive meetings which were organised by County Councillor Linda Jones. Her approach to traders and residents was both realistic and clear. We are very pleased with the outcome of all her decisions and we believe she has worked hard to achieve what is best for Petersfield. We would like to acknowledge our gratitude to her and her team.
My position as the Chair for Mill Road Traders is to look after both sides of the bridge and make sure the Romsey side benefits from this money too. I am not sure how much of this money has been allocated towards the parklet project and how this project has been granted. As it stands now this project is not well-planned and consulted therefore, I am asking people who are responsible for it to halt the project and listen to the voice of their constituents and use the money for better purposes. Some suggestions given by traders are:
Targeted advertising and publicity run by the Mill Road Traders’ Association
Equipment that can be used for other events i.e Community events
Improving disability access on Mill Road
Ad hoc events such as a Community lunch and networking events that can bring build a stronger community
Support for the Traders in need
Training and Skills workshops Traders and local Residents
Well informed policies that can deal with emergencies
Finally, I would like to emphasise the point that as responsible representatives of our community, our job is to listen, understand and care for the needs of our community.
Yours Sincerely Shapour Meftah Chair, Mill Road Traders’ Association Tuesday 16th July 2019
The Mill Road Summer team has been confused and saddened by a press release from the Mill Road Traders which arrived by email on Tuesday afternoon, 16th July and which will be reported on in the local news in the coming days. We’ve consistently tried to encourage involvement from local traders in Mill Road Summer and we’re working hard to support them and everyone else in our local community during this challenging time.
Mill Road Summer was organised by volunteers, councillors and community groups in Romsey to be an umbrella festival for all of the events happening on Mill Road while the bridge is closed to cars. Numerous public events have been held over the past few months with the local community and traders invited to help shape the plans and budget for the Mill Road Summer.
[W]e held public meetings for the whole of Mill Road and from these came a committee badged under the name of Mill Road Summer. This committee includes Mill Road business and Camcyle and other people from the community including people and business from Petersfield. … This group is using/going to use the money to provide events for the community that were designed to bring people onto Mill Road in the hope that the added footfall would in turn bring more trade to Mill Road businesses. These events are collated by us with grants provided [from Govia Thameslink Railway] when they are needed. Mill Road businesses are entitled to apply to be part of this, including obtaining grants for their events. We have repeatedly invited Mill Road Traders to our meetings…
Matters of financial compensation for Traders through a loss of trade are not part of our brief.
Dave Baigent FIFire E. FHEA.BA Hons. PhD. Cambridge City Councillor for Romsey, Thursday 18th July 2019
County Councillor Linda Jones adds…
Govia stated that we could use up to £15k for community related events in [the] Petersfield part of Mill Rd and the same for Romsey.
Linda Jones Cambridgeshire County Councillor for Romsey, Thursday 18th July 2019
A trader adds…
Just to add to the melée: events/promotion executed “here” with financial support from Govia that benefit BOTH sides of the Bridge include:— Mill Road map update— 6 ads in Cambridge Independent showing both sides of the Bridge, saying that Mill Road is open for business — Boot Sales open to all, including the wider Cambridgeshire audience of the Cambridge Independent. Pamela Wesson, Fantasia, Thursday 18th July 2019
Whilst arguments rage about whether surrounding roads will be overwhelmed with motor traffic, during the closure of Mill Road bridge, it is worth noting that fifteen sensors have been installed on Mill Road and surrounding streets to record the number of pedestrians, bicycles, cars and other vehicles. The data, to be analysed by the Smart Cambridge programme, will help the Greater Cambridge Partnership understand how people use the road network in the city. Read more.
As a society we accept that ‘rat running’ is bad and removing through traffic from residential areas is good. But we take the opposite view when the road in question has shops or is an ‘arterial’ route.
Plenty of research studies have shown that people who walk or cycle to a street spend more than those who drive there. And Mill Road isn’t really an arterial route: it only runs out as far as the outer ‘ring’ road. Would the impact of its closure be acceptable long-term? Let’s see: unlike mathematical models, real-life experiments give you real answers. Cameras have been set up to monitor changes in vehicle, cycle and pedestrian traffic on Mill Road and diversionary routes.
Was the closure or the signage (now amended) the biggest problem?
Many thanks to Sonia Hansen, Traffic Manager, Highways Service, Cambridgeshire County Council for ensuring that Businesses Open As Usual signage is installed at all access point to Mill Road, and to Glen Wakefield for following up problems with bus access.
There was considerable concern amongst Mill Road’s traders about the wording of the yellow and red warning notices on Perne Road, East Road and Gonville Place, which read:
MILL ROAD CLOSED NO THROUGH ROAD FOLLOW DIVERSION
ROAD AHEAD CLOSED
This, latter, was also the signage at the Coleridge Road junction.
Whilst these did the job of ensuring that vehicle drivers are warned against attempting to use the full length of Mill Road as a through route, they failled to make clear that:
the full length of Mill Road is accessible by foot and cycle (other than GTR’s planned total closure periods);
all Petersfield’s shops, cafés, restaurants and services are accessible, up to Devonshire Road, from the East Road junction;
the Gwydir Street car park is accessible from the East Road junction;
all Romsey’s shops, cafés, restaurants and services are accessible, up to Argyle Street, from the Perne Road junction;
the Great Eastern Street car park, the Mill Road Co-op car park and Cutlack’s car park are accessible from the Perne Road and Coleridge Road junctions.
Some traders were reporting a dramatic drop in volume of trade.
We enquired about what the Cambridgeshire County Council’s Highways Service could do to ameliorate this situation.
Many thanks to Sonia Hansen, Traffic Manager, Highways Service, Cambridgeshire County Council for ensuring that Businesses Open As Usual signage is installed at all access point to Mill Road, and to Glen Wakefield for following up problems with bus access.
We have received this forwarded email from Kobir Ahmed, Owner, Prana Indian Restaurant. It is the personal opinion of Kobir and does not necessarily reflect the view of Mill Road Bridges. It is published here to show the intensity of feelings about the ongoing railway and gas works.
We will of course publish any responses from public bodies, utilities and councillors.
I would like to formally bring to your attention my major concerns regarding the road closure, these views are supported by all traders that I have visited over the last couple of days, and can be seen on Twitter.
If things don’t improve, us traders will hold a protest rally, meaning blocking the road to all traffic and not allowing lorries to get to the bridge.
It’s all good and well closing a road for the benefit of others such as the council and contractors but this is a main road and shops depend on passing trade and also people not being told the road is closed.
The biggest impact on my business is trade has fallen by 50% since the road closure, as a small business I can’t afford to lose business like this, how to you expect me to pay rent, rates and wages at this rate? At first I thought things will be ok but now I am very worried if I can’t stay open in a few weeks!
There are other issues that is causing us traders concerns.
There is no proper communication, no one knows what happening, everything is a mess. There are bridge closures, gas pipes works it seems the council have allowed different works all happening at the same time! This makes the road more avoidable to passing traffic. It currently takes 20 mins to get from top of Mill Road to St Barnabas’ church due to extra traffic lights etc. Customers are avoiding Mill Road as they think Mill Road is closed! There needs to be more signage promoting businesses are open! And why has the gas works beenallowed to happen at the same time.
Since the road closure we are not getting passing trade, mill road is a tourist attraction the foot fall has fallen off massively and we are not attracting business. All business in reply in passing trade. We can’t just expect locals to visit us.
We are having potential customers calling us today to ask if we are open?
To remedy some concerns here are things we need to havelooked at.
Rates: the council need to compensate traders. Should we be expected to pay full rates when the road is closed off?
Compensation for traders for lost trade. Who is taking responsibility for this?
The Gwydir Street car park needs to be free for the duration of the works. We need people to be encouraged to come to Mill Road. People are not aware that there is access to Mill Road and that they can park at the car park. It’s been empty all last week and this week.
Mill Road is open sign, we need more signage to say Mill Road is open.
Council to invest money in advertising Mill Road.
The train companies will make £billions while we lose out. Cambridge council would have received £thousands for this road closure, where is this money going ? Why aren’t locals and traders having a say? The council would also get hefty fees for the gas works at the expenses of business.
We need answers and actions, I hope you can rally our anger, as it looks like no one is listening
We need business friendly policies not anti-business policies.
I hope you can channel this to your stakeholders as things unfortunately will only get worse.
There does seem to be confusion over who is responsible for what. There were problems with communications form Triio to Stagecoach over closing the Gwydir Street bus stop which I, personally, observed.
Kobir claims that “The train companies will make £billions while we lose out.” What is the case is that GTR, for whose depot development the bridge is closed was implicated in the disastrous mess of the May 2018 timetable change and (see elsewhere in this post) has provoked anger amongst the Mill Road community for poor communications.
Kobir claims that “Cambridge council would have received £thousands for this road closure”. Would that there only the one (unitary) authority for the Greater Cambridge region. (See Smarter Cambridge Transport’s graphic, below.) And would that GTR’s largesse stretched to £thousands in the city’s coffers.
Whether the residential council tax payer should fund a cut in business rates for these traders is a moot point. Certainly GTR should be pushed to compensate traders for proven losses.
Similarly, making the Gwydir Street car park free, might seem attractive, until we consider whether the spaces would be snapped up by rail commuters who wish to avoid charges at the station car park.
We are, again, indebted to Sonia Hansen, Traffic Manager, Highways Service, Cambridgeshire County Council for clarifying many of these matters, in an email to Piero d’Angelico, of Mill Road Traders.
Local City Councillors have been approached for comment.
I really appreciate your frustrations. In response to your queries –
Business rates are dealt with by the City Council and I have forwarded your email to them as they would be the ones to advise if there are any circumstances in which rebates can be applied for.
You would need to contact the works promotors directly regarding compensation schemes.
Gwydir Street Car Park is City Council so you will need to contact them directly. I have copied in Sean Cleary who manages City Car Parks.
We have changed the Variable Message Signs around the city to say ‘Mill Road closed at Bridge’ as opposed to ‘Mill Road Closed’ and I have requested that ‘Businesses Open as Usual’ signs are put out and I have seen these in place.
The County Council does not have a budget for advertising Mill Road. It may be something that the City Council or Visit Cambridge could advise you on.
Permit fees paid by utilities are used to administer the permit system and coordinate the works. Fees for road closures cover the costs of advertising and administering the order. We do not profit from permit fees and road closure orders. Letters were sent to all business and residents of Mill Road by Cadent on 16th June 2019 informing them of the works and need for access to premises to reconnect supplies. There were community meetings held in the run up to the works.
I do apologise for any inconvenience that you are experiencing during these essential works.
I hope this helps to clarify your queries.
Sonia Hansen Traffic Manager Highways Service Cambridgeshire County Council
County Councillor Linda Jones adds…
Many thanks Sonia, a helpful and clear response – and I think Piero’s email reflected specific frustrations at the time.
We have now had more problems in Petersfield with the terrible fire in Gees electrical store so are all feeling a bit battered!
However, we have worked with traders and residents throughout as Piero can testify and Triio and Cadent are getting really good at communicating with traders in a timely way. Just as important, Govia [responsible for railway works] Mill Road Depot staff, [gas grid operators] Cadent, [Cambridgeshire County Council Highways] Streetworks and [gas engineering contractors] Triio are talking to each other because all the works impact on others. I met with them all yesterday and we worked out a sequence that takes advantage of the closure due to the fire and gets some gas works done while allowing room for Mill Road depot lorries to enter/exit.
[County Highways officers] Ben Ely and Bob Turner were there and really helpful in facilitating a positive outcome.
I went to check this morning and the traders had been given a briefing from Cadent/Triio.
So good news too – out of the disruption…
All the best, Linda
Linda Jones Cambridgeshire County Councillor for Romsey, Thursday 18th July 2019
During the latest (planned) pedestrian closure – Friday 5th & Saturday 6th July 2019 08:45 – 20:45 – there was no advisory pedestrian/cycle route signage to direct people via the Carter Cycle Bridge, mid-morning.
One pedestrian who had walked up Devonshire Road from the station, with the intention of crossing the Mill Road Bridge to Romsey, was less than pleased to learn that she would need to retrace her steps.
We contacted officers from Cambridgeshire County Council’s Highways Service, asking, “Could GTR/Spencer we asked to urgently install pedestrian/cycle route signage at Devonshire Road, and the cycle bridge in Petersfield, and at Argyle Street, Stockwell Street, Cockburn Street, Charles Street, Greville Road and the cycle bridge in Romsey?”
We would like to record our thanks to Sonia Hansen, Traffic Manager and to Ben Ely, Street Works Inspector for taking action.
If GTR and their contractors, Spencer Group, were doing their jobs properly, there would be no need for this confusion.
GTR Deceit – or Two Men in a Van, Sucking Through Teeth?
Despite having a temporary footbridge in the 1980s when Mill Road bridge was rebuilt as part of the 1980s electrification programme, to accommodate the overhead electric line equipment, it’s apparently to possible nowadays.
Govia Thameslink had agreed to provide a footbridge for pedestrians during the closure of Mill Road bridge and had stated that the footbridge would be closed for one week and ‘occasional closure’. Govia has, at the last minute, increased the closures to affect four weekends.
Previously announced closure dates/times
Friday 5 July until Monday 8 July – from 8.45am until 8.45pm each day
Thursday 11 July until Saturday 13 July – from 8.45am until 8.45pm each day
Sunday 28 July until Wednesday 31 July – from 8.45am until 8.45pm each day
Saturday 3 August until Monday 5 August – from 8.45am until 8.45pm each day
Local City Councillor, Dave Baigent is ‘shocked’ at this last-minute change. Asking the rhetorical question: “Should we be surprised at Govia’s change in closure arrangements?” adding, “This last minute change, without any discussion, effectively cuts Romsey off from Cambridge City.”
Note: Mill Road Bridges is not politically aligned. Currently all Cambridge City Councillors and Cambridgeshire County Councillors in Romsey and Petersfield are Labour. We seek to work with whosoever are out elected representatives.
Mill Road poet and tweeter Carol Ann Wood speaks for many many in the #MillRdCamb with her belief that: “they [GTR] had planned on no footbridge to start with.”
And did 2 men get out of a white van with a few tools & a measuring tape, whistle through their teeth & say ‘no guv, can’t do that.’ My arse. Some bigwigs sat in a remote office & said ‘that’s going to cost too much. Anyway, people can drive the long way round.’
The County officer was also kind enough to remind us that:
Cadent Gas are taking the opportunity to carry out essential works to replace the gas main whilst the closure is in place and they will be working under temporary traffic signals. Their works will start either side of the bridge working towards each end of Mill Road.
Sonia Hansen, Traffic Manager, Highways Service, Cambridgeshire County Council
This was already reported on here on the Over Mill Road Bridge website.
Local trader Piero sent us this update 22 May 2019, at 16:21, which contradicts what we were told at the most recent ‘consultation’ meeting with GTR. Others, however, insist that this has been superseded by the current plans for a temporary footbridge…
I have spoken to the Project Director at Cambridge and can confirm that the Mill Road Bridge will be totally closed to ALL vehicles for the 8-week closure.
There is a new plan for a temporary footpath across the bridge which will mean using the existing footpath at one side and then moving this to the other side when the works move across. The original idea for a footbridge wasn’t feasible when it went through the design stages due to the pinch point being too narrow to allow people to pass each other safely.
I hope this helps and I will let you know if I hear of any further developments, but please do contact me if I can be of any assistance.
Diane, GTR coordinator
What is clear, however, is that from the very first GTR ‘consultation’ meeting, in Mill Lane, on Thursday 1 November 2018 we have been seriously concerned about the lack of effective communications from GTR with the local community.
Updates for bus services
During the traffic closure period of Mill Road Bridge to provide an enlarged arch for an additional tracks, shuttle bus services will be provided on both sides of the bridge. The ‘main’ citi2 route will be diverted via Coldham’s Lane.
In order to serve all existing stops, short wheelbase vehicles will be used. On the Petersfield side of the bridge, it’s planned to loop through Gwydir Street and Kingston Street. The Romsey shuttle is planned to use Argyle Street and Stockwell Street.
Transport campaigner and Mill Road resident, Susan Jourdain, reports that the shuttles will have a 20-minute frequency throughout current hours of operation.
Cambridge Area Bus Users informs us that the company is bringing in three short wheelbase vehicles – one for each shuttle and a spare for maintenance/breakdowns. These are 15-seaters with space for a wheelchair. By using such small vehicles all existing stops, either side of the bridge, can be served.
However, the drawback is that the vehicles would not have the capacity to serve the Birdwood area and onwards to Addenbrooke’s.
Is this good enough?
Whilst the Petersfield shuttle might be adequate, as onward connections to Addenbrooke’s can be made from the adjacent stop in Emanuel Street, Romsey have got a poor deal, losing direct services to the hospital, with all buses terminating at Brooks Road Sainsbury’s. Cambridge Area Bus Users informs us that Stagecoach stressed the difficulties in obtaining extra vehicles and, crucially, planning for extra driver duties. Others have suggested that GTR specified the shuttle service, without consulting bus users or local residents. Certainly no-one from Mill Road Bridges was consulted by GTR.
Full timetables and route maps for the diverted citi2, the 2A (Petersfield) and 2B (Romsey) shuttles are now available on the Stagecoach East website.
Some supplementary service is needed. For example, a Romsey resident who has a GP appointment in Petersfield or vice-versa. Moreover, there is no single service for Romsey or Petersfield residents to get them to Addenbrooke’s. The Over Mill Road Bridge website reported (19/052019) “We have been in discussion with Cambridge Dial-A-Ride about the possibility that their service could help to plug the gaps in the Stagecoach provision.”
More on the Over Mill Road Bridge website: Bridge Closure – Update #1 (Note: Over Mill Road Bridge is a campaigning organisation set up in 2018 by Romsey & Petersfield Labour Party.)
We are now indebted to Mill Road trader Piero d’Angelico for the GTR ‘Final Update’ which clarifies:
While the Mill Road Bridge is closed, GTR have made arrangements with Cambridge Dial-a-Ride scheme to assist residents who would otherwise find it difficult to use the revised public transport provisions.
Dial-a-Ride operates a door to door service, and, for the duration of the bridge closure, this will be AVAILABLE WITHOUT CHARGE to residents who are unable to use the revised bus service and will be adversely affected by the closure. How to apply to use the service.
From the very first GTR ‘consultation’ meeting, in Mill Lane, on Thursday 1 November 2018 we have been seriously concerned about the lack of effective communications with the local community.
Last Public Meeting
A public meeting was held on MONDAY 29TH APRIL 2019 at 18:30
We only learned about this public meeting on Friday 26th April 2019. There was nothing on-line. No email alerts. Just a few leaflets through some letterboxes. GTR’s communications were dreadful. Despite this – or possibly because of some energetic emailing and tweeting there was a decent turn-out.
Total closure to vehicles is scheduled for 1st July to 25th August 2019
There was considerable anger expressed about the poor publicity, and the fact that the many local residents and groups who had signed up for email updates at the meeting held at the Earl of Beaconsfield in November 2018 had never received any communications whatsoever.
There were, however updates in a powerpoint display which you can download as a PDF above.
There are severe deficiencies in the proposed shuttle bus services (see p11 of the GTR/Spencer slideshow). This will need to be addressed.
We understand that slide 11 is an ‘indicative’ map. Detailed examination suggests that it is ‘indicative’ of poor research.
The indicative citi2 diversionary route – via Coldham’s Lane is reasonably accurate, although no account is taken of the ‘short turns’ at Brooks Road Sainsbury’s.
The indicative shuttle bus route 2A in Petersfield shows wrong-way running in Kingston Street, ignoring the one-way system. Even a Gwydir-Hooper-Kingston loop would be difficult given the tight junction at Hoper St / Kingston St and the narrowness of Kingston Street.
The only practical Petersfield solution is a Tenison Road – St Barnabas Road loop with a temporary stop by St Barnabas church. Even then, Stagecoach would need to use a shorter vehicle, such as an Optare Solo midibus.
We now have more information of the vehicles to be deployed, see above.
A stand-alone shuttle might be acceptable, as Petersfield passengers could change to the citi 1 or 7 for Addenbrooke’s, in Emanuel Street. There is, however, a big question mark over the proposed frequency of this service.
The only practical Romsey solution is a Hope Street – Argyle Street – Cockburn Street loop with a temporary stop by Tesco. Even then, Stagecoach would need to use a shorter vehicle, such as an Optare Solo midibus.
We now have more information of the vehicles to be deployed, see above.
The unacceptable feature of this indicative service is that it would appear to propose that Romsey residents are to be provided with only a shuttle link to Brooks Road Sainsbury’s, where they would be required to change buses for the city centre or for Addenbrooke’s. Guaranteeing connections would be well-nigh impossible.
Romsey residents are already annoyed at the service reduction (from a 10- to 20-minute frequency) to Addenbrooke’s. Similarly, whilst Birdwood Area Residents’ Association will retain the (already reduced) frequency to Addenbrooke’s and to the city centre, they will loose all links to Mill Road Broadway’s independent shops and cafés and to the new mosque.
An acceptable service would be for the diverted citi2 ‘short turns’ to continue from Brooks Road Sainsbury’s to Mill Road Broadway and for alternate buses from Mill Road Broadway to travel to Addenbrooke’s via the usual route.
Stagecoach, as a commercial bus operator, cannot be expected to fund the additional services – including the hiring-in of extra vehicles, and the additional driver duties – needed because of the closure of Mill Road Bridge. These costs should be met by GTR at whose behest Mill Road Bridge will be closed.
Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) has promised to instal the footbridge to allow pedestrian access between the areas of Romsey and Petersfield when Mill Road Bridge is closed for railway works beneath it in 2019.
And following weeks of protest from traders on Mill Road worried the closure would discourage shoppers, GTR has agreed to move the works from springtime to July and August, when many residents are on holiday, to lessen the impact on businesses. Read more…
A comment from a local resident
To The Editor.
I welcome the recent news that ‘Govia Thameslink Railway and Network Rail’ have agreed a temporary footbridge during the Mill Road Bridge closure. The seeds for this agreement were sown at their initial public meeting in the ‘Double Tree by Hilton Hotel’ in Granta Place on 1st November last year, where the proposal was put cogently and sensibly by representatives of the ‘Mill Road Traders’ Association’ and ‘Camcycle’, together with several residents of the Mill Road Area.
The ‘Thames Govia’ Managing Director, accompanied by a Chief Engineer for the project, listened attentively and recorded the contributions; and at subsequent open meetings in Mill Road the Company took on board further ideas for the construction, positioning and design of a temporary bridge in that location.
It is good to know that a balanced democratic approach has worked so well and, in my opinion, would have probably achieved this welcome result without making it into a Local Party Political Issue!
The idea of reducing the amount of motor vehicle traffic on Mill Road has been much discussed in recent years. Benefits could include reduced pollution, safer cycling and walking, more reliable bus services and a more pleasant environment in which to live, work and shop. But we’re all conscious of the potential downsides – eg the impact on traffic in surrounding roads, the inconvenience for private motorists in particular for disabled drivers and the elderly, and logistical problems for bulk deliveries to the shops and business on Mill Road. The financial cost (or benefit) of reduced traffic on local shops and businesses is also unclear.
So given that the bridge has to be closed to vehicles for at least 8 weeks in 2019, there’s clearly an opportunity to better understand the impact of reducing traffic on this key Cambridge thoroughfare.
See also updates on the Over Mill Road Bridge petition website, set up by Romsey & Petersfield Labour Parties.
Mill Road Bridges is non-political and non-aligned but we welcome people of any political party (or none) and any religion (or none) who are sticking up for Mill Road. And do sign the petition.
Sophie Barnett one of our Romsey City Councillors has invited Network Rail to a meeting with Romsey and Petersfield Councillors. She is waiting for a response. The Councillors will want to ask how Network Rail and Govia Thameslink can address resident and business concerns about the impact of the Bridge closure.
Noel Kavanagh, Cambs County Councillor for Romsey, has asked about the process Network Rail will follow to get permission to close the Bridge. They will need to apply for a Temporary Traffic Regulation Order (TTRO). Cambs County Council will publicise the Order, but there is no public consultation. So there is no direct consideration of public objections to the closure. We’ve asked Noel if he can find out how Cambs County Council will assess the TTRO application. We’re assuming the application will need to meet some criteria – what are they?
Reference was made to the rebuilding of Mill Road Bridge as part of the 1980s electrification programme, to accommodate the overhead electric line equipment.
During that rebuilding, from May to November 1980, the bridge was open to (signalled) motor traffic, whilst pedestrian/cycle access was maintained on a temporary bridge, adjacent to the north. [Source: Capturing Cambridge – Mill Road Bridge]
The concerns of traders were raised. All of Mill Road’s independent traders have considerable custom arriving by foot and cycle, however some sell £100s of their speciality goods to customers using motor vehicles.
The point was made that ‘This is Mill Road, Cambridge’ – we’re all only a couple of degrees of separation from somebody with engineering expertise. If Mill Road bridge is to be closed to motor traffic – disrupting all deliveries and some trade to shops, and severing our bus service – GTR and Spencer Group will need to show us precisely why the bridge cannot be kept open through the works, in a way that can be closely scrutinised by those in the community with the relevant skills. Otherwise Mill Roaders will assume that the wool is being pulled over our eyes.
Things do appear to have moved on since the meeting on Thursday 1st November, in – ahem – Mill Lane.
Time of the Works
GTR are now looking to do the works later in the year July/August 2019, taking account of the feeling amongst traders that this would have less effect on trade than May/June. Local parents pointed out that July/August would be less disruptive to parents/pupils of (particularly) St Mathew’s and St Philip’s primary schools, and to pupils/staff of Cambridge Academic Partnership – responsible for secondary schools at Parkside, Coleridge and Trumpington. Our understanding is that GTR promised to consult local schools and to take account of school term/holiday dates.
Foot and cycle access
In the leaflet (reproduced above) GTR say, “We are looking to provide planned periods of pedestrian access throughout the period,” which implies a lack of commitment to continuous pedestrian access and makes no mention of cycle access.
Our understanding is that GTR and Spencer Group are currently planning the design and installation of a pedestrian bridge. It is not clear, at this stage, if cyclists will need to dismount. It appears to be the case that such a bridge will be open through any closure of the bridge to motor-traffic, save for short periods where it cannot remain open for reasons of engineering and public safety.
Public Realm Enhancements
Cambridge Cycling Campaign would like to see temporary enhancements to the public realm, during any closure to motor-traffic. In particular, hiring and installing pre-assembled ‘parklets’. See their vision for Mill Road with no through-traffic. Our understanding is that GTR will be meeting with Cambridge Cycling Campaign to discuss there ideas and their concerns.
Mill Road Bridges Treasurer, Richard Wood, joined with Cambridge Area Bus Users Secretary, Richard Wood, in stressing the importance of providing substitute bus links in the event of closure of Mill Road bridge to motor-traffic. We were assured that GTR are in discussions with Stagecoach East over providing a substitute service. Our understanding is that any proposed timetable will be open to public consultation.
The usual diversionary route for citi2, when Mill Road is closed (eg for Mill Road Winter Fair) is via East Road, Newmarket Road , Coldhams Lane and Brooks Road, resuming its normal route to Addenbrooke’s Hospital via Perne Road and Birdwood Road.
Below are personal suggestions, please add your own comments, below the line.
On the Petersfield side, a previous bridge closure has seen a link bus service routed city centre – Mill Road – Tenison Road – St Barnabas Road and return, with Gwydir Street inbound and outbound stops suspended. With the bridge closed, a temporary stop on Mill Road outside St Barnabas Church (city-bound) would be feasible.
Both Tenison Road and St Barnabas Road are, technically, wide enough to take any standard HGV or bus, although a smaller vehicle (eg Optare Solo) might be more manageable. Because of congestion in Emmanuel Street, it is a moot point whether such a service should terminate in the city centre, or continue on the remainder of the route to Cambridge North Station via Chesterton.
On the Romsey side of Mill Road a Hope Street – Argyle Street – Cockburn Street loop might be possible. Again, a smaller bus might be advisable, and some parking suspensions might be required in those side streets. Mill Road Broadway inbound and outbound stops would need to be suspended and replaced with a temporary stop outside Mill Road Tesco.
A 20-min frequency Romsey Town – Perne Road – Birdwood Road – Addenbrooke’s, service would match the existing service to Addenbrooke’s. This might be supplemented with a 20-min frequency Romsey Town – Brooks Road Sainsbury’s – Coldhams Lane – Newmarket Road – East Road – city centre – Chesterton – Cambridge North Station.
The schedule might be completed with a a 20-min frequency Addenbrooke’s – Birdwood Road – Brooks Road Sainsbury’s- Coldhams Lane – city centre – Chesterton – Cambridge North service.
The timing of the meeting had been controversial with Mill Road’s traders, as it was in the week leading up to Mill Road Winter Fair on Saturday 1st December 2018 – probably the worst time for Mill Road’s Traders.
On 9 Nov 2018, Diane Rowe wrote to Piero d’Angelico of Mill Road Traders:
I hope you are well.
We have managed to secure a room at the Beaconsfield Arms on the 27th November. Many apologies – I know you said it was too close to the Christmas Fair but the room had been sourced and it was the only day that everyone could do. It will be in the form of a drop-in from 13:00 through until 20:00, which hopefully will mean people will be able to pop in at a time convenient to them.
I wonder if you have a list of the members of the traders association? We will try as much as possible spend local and it would be useful to know who the local suppliers are and who to contact.
Diane Rowe Customer Relationship Manager Spencer Group One Humber Quays Wellington Street West HULL HU1 2BN
Shapour Meftah replied:
Thank you for your email which was sent to Piero, I am very glad that we are working on some sort of solution. As you may not be aware, we are at this moment in time in the run up to preparations for the Mill Road Winter Fair which is a very important event on our annual calendar and for our local community. As discussed on previous occasions the date initially suggested of the 21/22 of November was suitable but that has now been changed by you and after discussing this with a number of traders the suggested date of the 27th by you is not convenient for the traders, we would prefer to postpone the meeting until after the Mill Road Winter Fair and if possible at a more appropriate venue.
I’d like to suggest either St. Barnabas Church or The Salvation Army on Mill Road as an alternative venue.
Whilst we accept that you have the right to hold the meeting whenever you want, we would rather you don’t include the traders in the programme or literature of the drop-in session.
Shapour Meftah Chair of Mill Road Traders’ Association
I’m a CamCycle volunteer helping out with our Mill Road campaign.
I am pleased to see that you have published Martin Lucas-Smith’s article about our vision for Mill Road with no through-traffic, which would allow more room for pedestrians, cyclists and delivery vans, reduce congestion, improve air quality and make the street a more pleasant destination. We think the closure of the bridge next summer is a great opportunity to trial elements of our vision. We would love the Mill Road community’s input, and would appreciate Mill Road Bridges being involved in this process.
We are holding two drop-in public consultations over the coming weeks to gather the views of residents, traders and visitors to Mill Road.
As Friday 2 November 2018 appears to be the deadline for submission of objections to the Govia Thameslink Railway and Network Rail planning application, our treasurer submitted an objection Mill Road bridge works 18:1372:CAP18 objection (PDF 49 KB) asking that conditions be imposed on the applicants to ensure maximum access from the Romsey ward to the east of the railway bridge to the Petersfield ward to the west at the bridge location. Easy access for pedestrians and cyclists is the most essential for the viability of the independent traders for which Mill Road, Cambridge, is justifiably famous, and of which the community is justifiably proud. The greatest volume of sales from Mill Road’s shops is to customers who arrive on foot or by pedal-cycle.
Public meeting at the Double Tree Hilton at 6pm on 1 November
Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR), Network Rail and its contractors hosted a public meeting at the DoubleTree by Hilton, Granta Place, Mill Lane, Cambridge, CB2 1RT at 6pm on Thursday 1 November 2018 to discuss the proposed eight-week closure of Mill Road bridge in Cambridge from May 2019.
Why it was not held at a venue on Mill Road we do not know. Was it to make things difficult? Or did no-one at GTR realise that Mill Lane and Mill Road are not adjacent locations?
Our treasurer raised his frustrations at the poor responses from Network Rail and Govia Thameslink Railway to our request (see below) to be kept informed. Whilst Network Rail did contact him, he had no response from Govia Thameslink Railway.
Neither they nor Network Rail informed him of this meeting.
Will the bridge remain open for pedestrians and cyclists? What linking bus services can be provided along the two sections of Mill Road? What will be the impact on Mill Road’s independent traders?
We have contacted Network Rail and Govia Thameslink Railway asking to be included in all consultations.
The text submitted on the various web contact forms is as follows:
We understand that Mill Road bridge in Cambridge is scheduled to be closed to all motor traffic from May to July 2019, in connection with installing an additional rail line beneath the bridge for access to an expanded maintenance depot for GTR trains.
Please ensure that our community organisation – Mill Road Bridges – is included in all consultations. Our main concern is that the bridge will remain open for pedestrians and cyclists between the two sections of Mill Road in Petersfield ward to the west of the railway and in Romsey ward to the east.
Failure to ensure pedestrian and cycle access at all times will impact severely on the independent traders for which Mill Road, Cambridge is justifiably famous, and of which the community is justifiably proud.
Throughout the closure, we would like to see the Greater Cambridge Partnership fund impact studies:
Traffic counts on other routes to the city centre and Grafton Quarter to measure the actual (rather than projected) traffic displacement
Surveys of traders on the impact on their takings and on deliveries
Surveys of pedestrians, cyclists, bus users and local residents using Mill Road on how their journeys have been affected
This will be essential data for planning a positive outcome for more permanent traffic reduction along Mill Road, a reduction of congestion, an improvement in air quality on the Mill Road corridor, safer cycling, amore pedestrian-friendly environment, bus service reliability, whilst minimising disruption to traders and residents.
The new mosque was designed by the late David Marks MBE, a Jewish architect who, along with spouse Julia Barfield, invented and designed the London Eye. One has to say that Dr Winter, being the son of an architect himself, has recruited a professional who has created a stunning gem for Cambridge.
To each side of the main entrance, which will look out onto gardens, into which the whole community will be welcome, will be a community meeting-room (to the west) and a café (to the east).
The timber deliberately – and effectively, in the view of this honoured visitor – evokes trees in a forest.
Natural daylight floods the main prayer hall from the ‘forest canopy’ of the structural timber trees. This is in tune with the desire to create a world-class eco-mosque of which all of our communities – Cambridge’s Muslims of many traditions, the wider Cambridge community, and the Mill Road ‘community of communities’ can be justifiably proud.
Whilst female and male worshippers pray separately, in practice the degree of separation in different traditions has considerable variation, explained Islamic scholar and academic, Dr Winter. Some sisters do not want to be on view by the brothers whilst praying, others wish to be in the sisters’ own area but feel no need to be obscured. Whist there will be a sisters’ gallery, building permanent physical separation in the main prayer hall, would take no account of variations in different Islamic traditions, nor of potential future variations in the proportion of sisters vis-à-vis bothers worshipping.
The Cambridge Mosque Trust will not follow or expect adherence to any particular school of Islam and will welcome worshippers from every part of the Muslim family, of both genders. [from Cambridge Mosque Trust’s Mission Statement]
The solution? A beautiful, intricately-carved, moveable wooden screen will be constructed, which will delicately taper from above 2 m in height by one wall to reach ground level at some point across the prayer-hall. Any sister, from any tradition should, thus, be able to find a prayer-space with which she is comfortable.
The octagonal windows, high in the wall, and the arched windows of the dome will have an extra layer of coloured glass in islamic patterns.
Well, the dome, clad in gold-effect copper-anodised zinc, would look spectacular from an open-top tourist bus.
On the less-visible parts of the roof will be eco-friendly, sustainable energy equipment – photovoltaic arrays and air-source heat-pumps* – together with rainwater harvesting apparatus.
[*Whilst ground-source heat-pumps have some advantages over air-source – particularly at low air-temperatures – the large underground car-park and the height of the water-table on the site ruled this out as an option, Dr Winter explained.]
One can see how the sustainable energy installations will go a long way towards fulfilling the plan to be Europe’s first eco-mosque.
Reflecting Islam’s contribution to contemporary debates over sustainability, the mosque will incorporate significant design features which will minimise carbon emission and emphasise the role of faith in promoting responsible management of the earth’s resources. [from Cambridge Mosque Trust’s Mission Statement]
The edges of the roof will be finished with crenellation stones cut in an English quarry, to be fitted by an Irish company.
The international sourcing of the mosque will be completed inside with marble flooring from Spain, and oak panelling from Northern Ireland, whilst service access grilles will be comprised of wooden decorative panels.
Exterior walls will be finished off with tile cladding evoking Cambridge’s Victorian bricks – whites with red detail – and the alternating red and white brick and stone elements of (eg) the Mosque of Cordoba, in beautiful patterns of Islamic calligraphy.
Site Manager Stephen Rodgers remarked that a number of Belfast construction workers are about to become the province’s leading experts on Islamic calligraphy. He probably wasn’t joking: any tiling errors would need to be dismantled and re-clad!
The mosque is due to open in January 2019. (This visitor was relieved that this would be well before the Brexit deadline caused any potential hiccoughs – or worse – to supply chains and the availability of specialised workers.)
If you are equally impatient to see the wonders of the new Cambridge Mosque. Take a look at the Cambridge Mosque Trust’s photographic gallery.
CHS Group (the trading name of The Cambridge Housing Society Ltd) claims demolition and re-development is needed to fulfil its charitable duty to provide as much social housing as possible.
The loss of the square would not only mean the loss of well-loved homes and valuable green space, but also the loss of a vision of how housing should be, with areas that are individual and areas that are communal, with places to meet and to play as well as space to relish personal privacy.
Montreal Square was built by Cambridge Housing Society which was started in 1927 by Alderman Conder, Councillor Mrs D Stevenson and Dr Alex Wood (after whom the hall in Norfolk St and the bus shelter in Petersfield are named). The CHS was set up to help families who couldn’t afford market rents.
When the Montreal Square houses were built they didn’t have a separate bathroom but had baths in the back kitchen with a lid over it to form a table.They were still very popular with the first residents.
As reported in the Cambridge Independent Press of November 30th 1928, the Mayor, Alderman J.E Purvis visited Romsey, and a plaque was unveiled which can still be seen today.
Nigel Howlett, CHS’s Chief Executive said: “As a charity, we have a duty to provide as much affordable housing in Cambridge as we can. Private rented property in Cambridge is unaffordable for people on low incomes – we want to build more affordable homes to help more people. It’s currently very difficult for CHS to find or build affordable housing in Cambridge, where need and lack of affordability is greatest. We recognise that moving customers out of their homes will be disruptive and we will do our best to offer them as much support as we can.” May 2018
After our last meeting in May which ended in a stalemate as we were not prepared to go forward and discuss the best way to Demolish our homes, CHS asked us to discuss with residents if they wanted us to discuss a design brief for the development of Montreal square.
As the majority of residents still remain totally against the idea of destroying homes and a well established community the answer was a resounding NO.
On the 5th June we sent a letter to CHS to inform them of our decision advising them that we could not continue with their consultation period which only had the aim of doing a design brief.
Attached is a copy of the letter all residents received from CHS last week. Again CHS choose to try and divide the community by asking the minority to go against the majority and get involved in a design brief.
We are still doing every Saturday afternoon outside the Co-op on Mill Road collecting signatures of support from the local community.
With the online petition and the hard copy from the Co-op we have over 2,000 signatures of support now.
CHS have said they will get back to us by the end of July.
That, by July, is over 6 months of stress and anxiety for the residents with the possibility of a lot more to come yet.
Letter to Montreal Square residents from CHS Group Chair
18 June 2018
Thank you for your letter of 5th June, received last week.
We note that many of you remain opposed to any redevelopment. Your letter also clarifies that the strong sense of community among Montreal Square residents is based on shared social values and responsibilities, which add to the pleasure and wellbeing from living there.
As agreed at the first public meeting in February, we will move on to develop options for a redevelopment scheme, working with any residents who wish to have further input. We assume from your letter that the Residents Committee is choosing not to participate in this, but we are very happy to involve them if they wish. These options will be shared with all residents. We will get back to you by the end of July to outline how a decision will be reached.
The panel of Board members that met with the Residents Committee has already accepted the invitation to visit Montreal Square and remain happy to do so if you would like to suggest some convenient times.
Kind regards, Nicola Scrivings Chair of CHS Group
Letter to Montreal Square residents from CHS Group Chief Executive
26 July 2018
In June we said we would let you know by the end of July how the CHS Board will reach a decision on the future of Montreal Square. This letter outlines what will now happen, so that the Board can make a final decision at their meeting in mid October.
To reach a decision, the Board will need to weigh the problems that would be caused by a redevelopment against its advantages, mainly extra affordable housing.
So our next steps are:
To develop an outline design, as requested at the first public meeting, that will include all the feedback you and your neighbours have given us about how any redevelopment would affect you and what you would want in a potential scheme.
To give you an opportunity to comment on this potential design before this is presented to the Board.
To get an indication from the City Council Planning Department that the outline scheme is likely to meet their requirements. This is so we can be reasonably confident that the Board will be considering the advantages of a scheme that might be able to go ahead if they decide to proceed with redevelopment. It would also reduce revisions and delays both before and during any planning application stage.
To develop outline costings to make sure that the potential scheme is affordable for CHS and would deliver value for money in terms of additional affordable housing.
The Board will carefully consider what many of you have told us about the impact that any redevelopment of Montreal Square would have on you.
Although we understand that the current uncertainty is very uncomfortable for you, the earliest we believe we can produce all this information is by mid-October – which is an ambitious timescale for a scheme of this nature, especially as many aspects of the process are not within CHS‘s control.
If the Board decides in mid-October to go ahead with redevelopment, further work would then be required to submit a planning application and go through the approval process, all of which typically could take between 12 and 24 months.
As we think it is important to talk this through with each of you in more detail, we would like
to visit you on 2, 7, 8 or 9 August. Please call our Customer Services Team on [✂︎] or email [✂︎] to let us know when would be convenient.
“OVER 2,000 people have said NO to the idea to DEMOLISHING Montreal Square”
The campaign to try and save our homes at Montreal Square, Cambridge, is still in progress. Back at the end of January Cambridge Housing Society told residents they wanted to look at the idea of DEMOLISHING Montreal Square to build more properties on the site.
Some 6 months later we are no further forward to them making a decision about this proposal and have just had a letter telling residents they will not make a decision until mid October. Their initial decision was going to be made in March.
Since March we have done what CHS had requested of us.
We have set up a democratically elected Montreal Square Residents Association at their request and we have attended three meetings.
At our last meeting we were asked to discuss the best way to DEMOLISH our homes. Unfortunately as we represent the majority of residents at Montreal Square it was decided that we could not continue with any steering groups or engagement panels that involved any design briefs because the majority oppose this idea.
CHS have since chosen to ignore the Montreal Square Residents Association and have again offered residents individual meetings about the redevelopment in order to try and get some residents to work with them against the majority of residents.
Romsey city Cllr Dave Baigent (Labour) said, “I think it would be a tragedy if they changed Montreal Square the disruption it would cause would damage that community. There is nothing left to recommend this process.”
Romsey Liberal Democrat team have said, “We are backing Montreal Square residents because mini-communities that make up Romsey are important and one with green space and mature trees doubly so.”
We believe now the only thing keeping this idea afloat is CHS’s obsession with trying to increase their revenue for this site.
Maybe their enthusiasm for this site would be better directed at maintaining the site better as very little as been done in the last 10 years.
The last story about Montreal Square was on the 16/05/2015.
Residents including the elderly and vulnerable feel it’s time to end this and allow us to live in peace.
The residents, some of whom have lived in the square for more than 40 years, say they will continue to fight the plans being consulted on by charitable housing association CHS Group. They have now gathered the support of Cambridge MP Daniel Zeichner, who says he cannot support a plan opposed by the community.
Mill Road poet, Carol Ann Wood visited some of the Montreal Square residents and was moved to write and record this poem in tribute to their campaign. Click the image to download your own copy of the poem. (PDF 6.7 MB)
Mill Road TV filmed the gathering and interviewed some of those present.
Cambridge Housing Society (CHS), a local housing association, announced earlier this year that 18 residences just off of Mill Road were to be demolished, replaced by over 30 new houses and blocks of flats. Varsity spoke to three women who are campaigning to preserve the square many have lived in for decades.
Cheryl Smith, 60, Marti King, 73, and Ann Byerley, 67, have lived on Montreal Square, a cul-de-sac of 18 homes just off Mill Road owned by CHS, for 17, 40, and 43 years respectively.
This is just eight years after CHS Group undertook some improvements to Montreal Square’s homes and accepted that residents did not want a redevelopment scheme…
1st 2010 letter to Montreal Square residents from CHS group
14th October 2010
The future of Montreal Square
I am writing to you to ask if we can come and visit you. The reason for this is that we need to ask for your views about the long term future of the houses at Montreal Square. CHS has begun a review due to the age and condition of these houses and we want to talk to you about the next steps.
Your Housing Officer Doug Stother would like to call on you personally at home on either Tuesday 19th October or Wednesday 20th October. He can come morning, afternoon or early evening. We have provisionally set a time of approximately 3:45 p.m. on Tuesday 19th October for Doug to visit you. However if this is not convenient, or you would prefer to meet somewhere else, then please do let us know and we will agree a more convenient time and location with you.
Doug works out of the office a lot of the time, and so it will not be easy for you to call him direct if you need to re-arrange the visit time. Therefore would you please call our Customer Service team on 0300 111 3555 who have access to Doug’s diary and can re-arrange the time for you.
I am sorry if this letter is quite short notice of our visit – we have assumed that you would be keen to ﬁnd out more about this as quickly as possible once we wrote to you.
2nd 2010 letter to Montreal Square residents from CHS group
23 December 2010
Last Monday I met with a group of residents from 10 of the houses in Montreal Square. We talked through what the next steps might be following our decision not to now pursue the option of redeveloping the Square to provide new modem homes.
The feeling of the meeting was that you wanted CHS to leave your homes alone and just make sure that we would carry out repairs and maintenance to keep your homes above the Decent Homes Standard. The meeting did not want us to explore more significant improvement options and the problems of funding these.
I explained to the meeting that while CHS was keen to be led by residents’ views about redevelopment and improvement it was possible that in the longer term we would have to you about this again. This is because we might well need to carry out some major works at some point in the future to ensure we provide homes that are more affordable to heat and maintain. I want to stress that we have absolutely no plans to do this but it is fair that I should explain that this might be an issue in the future.
I am writing this letter to make sure that everyone is aware of the latest position.
Last weeks meeting identified a number of building issues, including the need for some boiler replacements and loft insulation. I suggest therefore that the best way ahead is for us firstly to survey the condition of the houses in Montreal Square to draw up a complete plan of any work needed now or in the near future to make sure that we can keep them above the Decent Homes Standard. We propose to carry out surveys using our own property staff, starting in January, and at times agreed with each of you.
A question was asked about flushing through heating pipework and I can confirm that this is done as part of all our new boiler installations. We will let you know in January if you have a boiler that we plant to replace in the next few months.
Cambridge Labour passes motion in support of Montreal Square residents
The motion was proposed by Unite Cambridge Community branch, and seconded by Romsey Ward Labour Party in response to proposals by the CHS Group to demolish 18 homes to make way for the new development, which would bring more affordable homes to the area by reducing the size of the gardens. Read more…Go to top
Montreal Square Residents’ Association has issued a press release
On the 27th October 2018 Daniel Zeichner. Cambridge’s Labour MP, spoke to over 80 people who gathered to march the length of Mill Road in support of our campaign to save our homes.
He said He could not support anything not supported by the Residents and that he recommended that CHS talked to residents at not at them.
Liberal Democrat Councillor Rod Cantrill also joined the march and told everybody who had marched to Montreal Square that this is something Cambridge Liberal Democrat are against too.
Romsey ward Councillors have all given us their support with Councillor Noel Kavanagh attending the meeting with us on Thursday. He told CHS this project is risking their reputation in Cambridge. Read more (PDF 381 KB).Go to top
After issuing a press release (shown below) CHS Group informed their tenants of their fate a little later in the day.