Should parking on our streets be for residents and visitors, or an unregulated car-park for commuters?
See our readers’ comments. And add your own.
Many of the streets of Coleridge ward, around Rustat Road and around Romsey’s Greville Road and Argyle Street, have recently joined those of South Petersfield in residents’ parking schemes.
Those streets have seen some advantages:
- Commuters and occasional rail users who were unwilling to pay to park at the railway station, nor to take a bus or taxi, no longer clog the streets with their cars, for the whole day.
- Similarly drivers who want to park for free and walk to the city centre can no longer use these local streets.
- More road-space is available to local drivers and to cyclists.
- There are fewer vehicle movements on these streets.
There are, however, a few problems.
- Residents must now pay an annual fee to park in their street.
- Permits are required for visitors.
- As soon as one street has a residents’ parking scheme, the neighbouring street encounters the same problem.
This blog-post was triggered by an email to email our contact address.
Let’s have your views. There’s no character limit, unlike Twitter. So expound and expand, below. (Comments are pre-moderated.)